Search
Categories:
- NJ - Agents and Administrators (11)
- NJ - Attorney Client Privilege (7)
- NJ - Attorney's Fees (26)
- NJ - Bifurcate/Sever & Stays (16)
- NJ - Choice/Conflict of Law (3)
- NJ - Claims Handling (general) (31)
- NJ - Claims Handling (reasonable) (11)
- NJ - Claims Handling (unreasonable) (11)
- NJ - Conflict of interest (1)
- NJ - Consumer Fraud Act (10)
- NJ - Cooperation with insurer (1)
- NJ - Coverage Issues (39)
- NJ - Damages (1)
- NJ - Declaratory Judgment (9)
- NJ - Delay (Insured) (3)
- NJ - Delay (Investigation/Claims handling) (12)
- NJ - Delay (Payment) (4)
- NJ - Discovery and Evidence (13)
- NJ - ERISA Preemption (7)
- NJ - Estimates, Valuation or Appraisal (8)
- NJ - Experts (9)
- NJ - Federal Pleading Adequate (7)
- NJ - Federal Pleading Inadequate (14)
- NJ - General Bad Faith and Litigation Issues (40)
- NJ - Law unsettled (4)
- NJ - Limitations Period (4)
- NJ - Litigation Conduct (1)
- NJ - Negligence not bad faith (14)
- NJ - No coverage due, no bad faith (20)
- NJ - Procedural Issues (40)
- NJ - Punitive Damages (12)
- NJ - Reinsurance (1)
- NJ - Removal & Remand (3)
- NJ - Reservation of Rights (2)
- NJ - Reverse Bad Faith (30)
- NJ - Settlement related issues (23)
- NJ - Standing, Assignment or Outside Scope (9)
- NJ - Sureties (3)
- NJ - Sworn Statement/EUO (2)
- NJ - UIM/UM Cases (15)
- NJ - Work Product (4)
- NJ -ITPA and UCSPA (14)
- PA - Agents and Administrators (39)
- PA - Attorney Client Privilege (46)
- PA - Attorney's Fees (47)
- PA - Bifurcate/Sever & Stays (56)
- PA - Choice/Conflict of Law (22)
- PA - Claims Handling (general) (134)
- PA - Claims Handling (reasonable) (143)
- PA - Claims Handling (unreasonable) (91)
- PA - Common Law Bad Faith (contractual or fiduciary basis) (132)
- PA - Communication with insured (48)
- PA - Conflict of Interest (9)
- PA - Cooperation with insurer (19)
- PA - Coverage Issues (145)
- PA - Damages (3)
- PA - Declaratory Judgment (34)
- PA - Delay (Insured) (33)
- PA - Delay (Investigation/Claims handling) (95)
- PA - Delay (Payment) (48)
- PA - Discovery and Evidence (159)
- PA - ERISA Preemption (34)
- PA - Estimates, Valuation or Appraisal (86)
- PA - Experts (83)
- PA - Federal Pleading Adequate (91)
- PA - Federal Pleading Inadequate (109)
- PA - General Bad Faith and Litigation Issues (91)
- PA - Insurer wrong, but reasonable (13)
- PA - Late notice (5)
- PA - Law unsettled (18)
- PA - Limitations Period (68)
- PA - Litigation Conduct Claims (32)
- PA - Manuals (23)
- PA - Mediation (15)
- PA - MVFRL (39)
- PA - Negligence not bad faith (46)
- PA - No coverage due, bad faith still possible (35)
- PA - No coverage duty, no bad faith (139)
- PA - Procedural Issues (102)
- PA - Punitive Damages (49)
- PA - Red flags during investigation (11)
- PA - Reinsurance (13)
- PA - Release of bad faith claim (10)
- PA - Removal & Remand (86)
- PA - Reservation of Rights (20)
- PA - Reserves (35)
- PA - Reverse Bad Faith (67)
- PA - Settlement related issues (111)
- PA - Standing, Assignment or Outside Scope (76)
- PA - Sureties (10)
- PA - Sworn Statement/EUO (27)
- PA - UIM/UM Cases (306)
- PA - UIPA & UCSP (68)
- PA - Underwriting (10)
- PA - UTPCPL (34)
- PA - Venue (15)
- PA - Who is an Insurer? (24)
- PA - Work Product (34)
Links of Note
- Article: What is the Nature and Scope of the "Bad Faith" Conduct that can be Remedied Directly Under the Bad Faith Statute (2014)
- Business Courts Blog
- Fineman Krekstein & Harris, Philadelphia Insurance Bad Faith and Coverage Lawyers
- New Jersey Fraud Prevention Act
- NJ Unfair Insurance Practices Statute
- Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Statute
- Post Koken Scorecard in UM/UIM Cases - Tort Talk (Pennsylvania Tort Law Blog)
- Searching on this Blog
- Toy v Metropolitan
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Law
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Regs
Subscribe by Email
Signup to receive e-mail notifications about future blog posts.
0 Responses to “NOVEMBER 2013 BAD FAITH CASES: SUPERIOR COURT AFFIRMS BAD FAITH FINDING BASED ON ADJUSTER’S FAILURE TO PERFORM INDEPENDENT EVALUATION ON UIM CLAIM; PERMITS EXPERT TESTIMONY ON CLAIMS HANDLING; UPHOLDS PUNITIVE DAMAGE AWARD; AND DOES NOT PERMIT EXPERT FEES, INVESTIGATIVE FEES, ARBITRATION FEES AND TRIAL PREPARATION EXPENSES WITHIN THE TERM “COURT COSTS” (Pennsylvania Superior Court)”